Calhoun County, MI
Housing, jobs, water, deposits and federal obligations for this county, each figure with the release it came from. Internal point 42.24, -85.01.
Assembled 2026-10-06. Read the brief.
- 33rd pct · 2,050th of 3,063 US counties · median $234,566
- 25th pct · 62nd of 83 Michigan counties · median $226,891
- counties in the Battle Creek metro: Rank context is unavailable: the manifest lists 1 counties in the Battle Creek metro; fewer than 5 is too few to rank.
- 57th pct · 1,302nd of 3,063 US counties · median +2.9%
- 20th pct · 66th of 83 Michigan counties · median +5.7%
- counties in the Battle Creek metro: Rank context is unavailable: the manifest lists 1 counties in the Battle Creek metro; fewer than 5 is too few to rank.
- 18th pct · 1,147th of 1,399 US counties · median $1,496
- 17th pct · 33rd of 40 Michigan counties · median $1,338
- counties in the Battle Creek metro: Rank context is unavailable: the manifest lists 1 counties in the Battle Creek metro; fewer than 5 is too few to rank.
- 85th pct · 468th of 3,221 US counties · median 8,232
- 84th pct · 14th of 83 Michigan counties · median 12,414
- counties in the Battle Creek metro: Rank context is unavailable: the manifest lists 1 counties in the Battle Creek metro; fewer than 5 is too few to rank.
- 92nd pct · 240th of 3,221 US counties · median $1,039
- 95th pct · 5th of 83 Michigan counties · median $1,045
- counties in the Battle Creek metro: Rank context is unavailable: the manifest lists 1 counties in the Battle Creek metro; fewer than 5 is too few to rank.
- 9th pct · 2,766th of 3,063 US counties · median 4.3
- 1st pct · 82nd of 83 Michigan counties · median 4.1
- counties in the Battle Creek metro: Rank context is unavailable: the manifest lists 1 counties in the Battle Creek metro; fewer than 5 is too few to rank.
Typical home value divided by the average annual wage of one covered job.
A percentile here is a min-max scaling of average rank: the smallest published value in the cohort is 0 and the largest is 100, and tied values share the average of the ranks they span. It is not the share of entities below the value, so 0 means smallest, not none below. Entities that did not publish the metric are outside the cohort entirely and are counted in neither the rank nor its denominator.
Home values #
Typical home $190,938 (Aug 2026), +3.6% over one year, +25.3% over five
- 33rd pct · 2,050th of 3,063 US counties · median $234,566
- 25th pct · 62nd of 83 Michigan counties · median $226,891
- counties in the Battle Creek metro: Rank context is unavailable: the manifest lists 1 counties in the Battle Creek metro; fewer than 5 is too few to rank.
| Item | Value | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Calhoun County, MI | $190,938 · +3.6% 1-yr |
Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI), typical value of homes in the 35th to 65th percentile, smoothed and seasonally adjusted; a model estimate of value, not a sale price. Data through Zillow Research.
Rents #
Typical rent $1,142/mo (Aug 2026), +5.3% over one year; price-to-rent 13.9
- 18th pct · 1,147th of 1,399 US counties · median $1,496
- 17th pct · 33rd of 40 Michigan counties · median $1,338
- counties in the Battle Creek metro: Rank context is unavailable: the manifest lists 1 counties in the Battle Creek metro; fewer than 5 is too few to rank.
| Item | Value | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Calhoun County, MI | $1,142/mo · +5.3% 1-yr |
Zillow Observed Rent Index (ZORI), smoothed, all homes and multifamily; price-to-rent = typical home / (typical rent × 12).
What the typical home costs to carry #
Principal and interest of $1,045 a month on $190,938 at 7.28%, against an average weekly wage worth $6,478 a month: 16.1% of one job’s pay.
- payment = P·r / (1 − (1+r)^−n), P = $190,938 × 80% = $152,750, r = 7.28%/12 (Freddie Mac PMMS via FRED, 2026-10-01), n = 360 → $1,045/mo principal and interest
- wage share = payment / (avg weekly wage $1,495 × 52 / 12 = $6,478) = 16% of one average job's pay (BLS QCEW 2026 Q1, all covered jobs)
- years of wages = $190,938 / ($1,495 × 52) = 2.5
- price-to-rent = $190,938 / ($1,142 × 12) = 13.9
The wage is one covered job’s average, not a household’s income, so this is the share of a single paycheque and not a mortgage underwriting ratio.
Estimate. Principal and interest on the typical home with 20% down over 30 years at this week's Freddie Mac average rate; compared with the average weekly wage of all jobs covered by unemployment insurance in the area (BLS QCEW), which is pay per job, not household income.
Jobs & wages #
56,518 jobs at 2,736 employers (2026 Q1); +4.0% jobs and +8.8% average weekly wage over the year
- 85th pct · 468th of 3,221 US counties · median 8,232
- 84th pct · 14th of 83 Michigan counties · median 12,414
- counties in the Battle Creek metro: Rank context is unavailable: the manifest lists 1 counties in the Battle Creek metro; fewer than 5 is too few to rank.
| Item | Value | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Calhoun County, MI | 56,518 jobs · $1,495/wk · +4.0% YoY |
| NAICS sector | Jobs | Avg weekly wage | Location quotient | Jobs over the year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing | 10,092 | $1,617 | 2.22 | +0.3% |
| Health care and social assistance | 8,827 | $1,168 | 1.04 | -0.2% |
| Accommodation and food services | 5,938 | $460 | 1.17 | +37.9% |
| Retail trade | 5,656 | $734 | 1.03 | +0.6% |
| Administrative and waste services | 2,531 | $999 | 0.79 | +6.4% |
| Construction | 2,328 | $1,375 | 0.79 | +42.6% |
| Transportation and warehousing | 1,878 | $1,609 | 0.79 | -0.4% |
| Other services | 1,401 | $1,246 | 0.83 | +6.9% |
| Finance and insurance | 1,008 | $1,428 | 0.44 | +1.6% |
| Educational services | 822 | $775 | 0.68 | -5.2% |
| Agriculture, forestry, fishing | 632 | $715 | 1.55 | +0.0% |
| Arts, entertainment and recreation | 406 | $493 | 0.44 | +1.5% |
BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, all ownerships, total covered employment in the quarter's third month; over-the-year changes as published. Suppressed cells stay blank.
Drought #
No drought class at this point (USDM covers the United States only)
Sites found: 5, searched within 0 km of this place’s internal point. That is a disc around a point, not the area itself: sites outside the boundary are included, and sites inside it further than 0 km away are not.
US Drought Monitor current week; the highest class of any polygon containing the point.
Reservoirs #
No reservoir gauges within 150 km (or the camera is above the gauge altitude)
Sites found: 0, searched within 150 km of this place’s internal point. That is a disc around a point, not the area itself: sites outside the boundary are included, and sites inside it further than 150 km away are not.
Σ(capacity × percent full) / Σ capacity over TWDB reservoirs within 150 km. Texas only; elsewhere USGS reservoir elevation/storage is listed without a capacity to normalise by.
Stream gauges #
58 gauges · 0 flooding · 6 with quality panels averaging 100 % · 13 stale
Sites found: 58, searched within 75 km of this place’s internal point. That is a disc around a point, not the area itself: sites outside the boundary are included, and sites inside it further than 75 km away are not.
| Site | Reading | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| USGS-04103500 | flow 308.0 ft³/s · no flooding | 5 km |
| USGS-04103490 | flow 82.2 ft³/s | 5 km |
| USGS-041035285 | flow 2.72 ft³/s · quality 100 % (1) | 10 km |
| USGS-04103010 | flow 278.0 ft³/s · STALE | 13 km |
| USGS-04105000 | flow 167.0 ft³/s · observation not current | 15 km |
| ST. JOSEPH RIVER NEAR BURLINGTON, MI | flow 358.0 ft³/s · STALE | 16 km |
| ST. JOSEPH RIVER AT BURLINGTON, MI | flow 132.0 ft³/s · no flooding | 17 km |
| USGS-04105500 | flow 548.0 ft³/s · no flooding | 18 km |
| USGS-04104945 | flow 32.5 ft³/s | 20 km |
| HOG CREEK AT CADY RD AT HODUNK, MI | flow 64.3 ft³/s · quality 100 % (1) | 25 km |
USGS latest readings screened against EPA freshwater criteria (DO ≥ 5 mg/L, pH 6.5–9, conductance, turbidity, temperature); NWS flood categories where a NWPS gauge is co-located.
Groundwater #
68 wells in 1 named aquifer: Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions)
Sites found: 68, searched within 75 km of this place’s internal point. That is a disc around a point, not the area itself: sites outside the boundary are included, and sites inside it further than 75 km away are not.
| Site | Reading | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| USGS-422021085081101 | depth 10.1 ft · 1992-09-30 | 15 km |
| USGS-422033085082602 | depth 20.6 ft · 2003-09-29 | 15 km |
| USGS-422033085082601 | depth 15.7 ft · 2002-05-06 | 15 km |
| USGS-422032085091801 | depth 21.2 ft · 2009-09-29 | 16 km |
| USGS-422056085211701 | depth 10.7 ft · 2026-10-05 | 31 km |
| USGS-415602084593701 | depth 23.2 ft · 2026-10-05 | 34 km |
| USGS-421614085270801 | depth 10.9 ft · 2026-08-23 | 36 km |
| USGS-421918085283801 | depth 4.02 ft · 2026-08-23 | 39 km |
USGS latest daily water levels. A single latest reading says where the table is, not which way it is moving; select a well for its 365-day trace.
Water stress #
low (0.00)
Σ wᵢ·termᵢ / Σ wᵢ = 0.35×0.00 + 0.2×0.00 / 0.55
Banks & federal dollars #
$1.3 bn in deposits at 17 offices of 10 banks (SOD June 2026); HHI 1,890, highly concentrated. $1.1 bn federal obligations in FY2026 (direct payments $914.7 m, contracts $104.1 m), $19,267 per covered job
| Item | Value | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Fifth Third Bank, National Association | $379.0 m · 28.4% share · 3 offices | |
| The Huntington National Bank | $303.6 m · 22.7% share · 4 offices | |
| Southern Michigan Bank & Trust | $277.7 m · 20.8% share · 3 offices | |
| Calhoun, MI | $1.1 bn FY2026 · $19,267/job | |
| MULTIPLE RECIPIENTS | $881.8 m · top recipient FY2026 |
| Institution | Deposits | Share | Offices |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fifth Third Bank, National Association | $378,986,000 | 28.4% | 3 |
| The Huntington National Bank | $303,591,000 | 22.7% | 4 |
| Southern Michigan Bank & Trust | $277,726,000 | 20.8% | 3 |
| PNC Bank, National Association | $102,729,000 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Old National Bank | $64,882,000 | 4.9% | 1 |
| Highpoint Community Bank | $50,478,000 | 3.8% | 1 |
| Homestead Savings Bank | $49,478,000 | 3.7% | 1 |
| County National Bank | $46,791,000 | 3.5% | 1 |
| Flagstar Bank, National Association | $38,492,000 | 2.9% | 1 |
| Sturgis Bank & Trust Company | $21,701,000 | 1.6% | 1 |
Deposit concentration is 1,890 across 10 banks, which the 1995 Department of Justice bank merger screen calls highly concentrated.
HHI = Σ (share %)² over 10 banks with deposits in the county = 28.4² + 22.7² + 20.8² + … (7 more) = 1,890
FDIC Summary of Deposits: deposits at every insured office as of June 30, annual; HHI is the sum of squared county deposit shares (DOJ 1995 bank merger screen: 1000 / 1800). USAspending: obligations by place of performance for the latest complete federal fiscal year (Oct 1 to Sep 30), what agencies committed, not what they paid out; recipients are legal entities. Per-job divides obligations by BLS QCEW covered employment.
Federal obligations #
USAspending place-of-performance obligations for FY2026, by awarding agency.
| Awarding agency | Obligations |
|---|---|
| Social Security Administration | $728,834,924 |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | $119,078,249 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | $76,656,846 |
| Department of Defense | $57,192,732 |
| Department of Transportation | $32,493,195 |
| Department of Homeland Security | $16,160,015 |
| Department of Education | $14,198,721 |
| Railroad Retirement Board | $12,759,478 |
| Department of Housing and Urban Development | $9,926,678 |
| General Services Administration | $8,194,023 |
| Department of Agriculture | $6,795,648 |
| Federal Communications Commission | $4,744,985 |
That is $19,267 per covered job, against 56,518 jobs in the 2026 Q1 QCEW quarter.
per job = FY2026 obligations $1.1 bn / 56,518 covered jobs (BLS QCEW 2026 Q1, all ownerships) = $19,267
USAspending obligations are recorded where the work is performed, so a prime award performed here is counted here even when the recipient is headquartered elsewhere. Recipients are legal entities, never people.
National context, not this county #
These are United States, single-gauge, single-state and port series. None of them is keyed to this county.
| Series | Latest | As of | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi River at Memphis, stage · ft | not published | not published | |
| Mississippi River at St. Louis, stage · ft | not published | not published | |
| Ohio River at Louisville, stage · ft | 12.69 | 2026-10-05 | +3.3% |
| Missouri River at St. Joseph, stage · ft | not published | not published | |
| Colorado River below Hoover Dam, flow (Hoover releases) · ft³/s | 5,170.00 | 2026-02-05 | -25.3% |
| Texas reservoirs, statewide percent full · % | 72.60 | 2026-10-06 | +0.0% |
| Laredo truck crossings, monthly · trucks | 258,700.00 | 2026-08-01 | -0.4% |
| Los Angeles + Long Beach container volume, annual · TEU | 10,513,167.00 | 2023-01-01 | -13.5% |
| Containerships waiting for a berth, all US ports · ships | 6.00 | 2026-09-22 | -14.3% |
| Shanghai to Los Angeles container rate · $ per 40 ft box | 6,830.00 | 2026-08-01 | +7.4% |
| US diesel retail price · $ per gallon | unavailable | not published | |
| WTI crude oil, spot · $ per barrel | 96.16 | 2026-09-29 | -3.2% |
| 30-year fixed mortgage rate · % | 7.28 | 2026-10-01 | +3.6% |
| Housing starts, annual rate · thousands of units | 1,275.00 | 2026-08-01 | -2.6% |
| Building permits, annual rate · thousands of units | 1,403.00 | 2026-08-01 | -2.1% |
| Case-Shiller US home price index · index, Jan 2000 = 100 | 337.31 | 2026-07-01 | +0.1% |
| Unemployment rate · % | 4.20 | 2026-09-01 | +2.4% |
| US goods and services trade balance, monthly · $ millions | -88,576.00 | 2026-07-01 | -24.4% |
| Retail sales excluding food services, monthly · $ millions | 646,347.00 | 2026-08-01 | +1.1% |
The indicator registry has no county-keyed series and no geographic selection: every entry is national, a named gauge, a single state or a port. They are here as the backdrop the county's own numbers move against, and they are never this county's readings.
What changed #
Calhoun County, MI: 12 findings, 1 at a watch level and 11 noted
watchCalhoun County, MI's typical home value of +3.6% scores 58 on the 0-to-100 scale across US counties but 21 across Michigan counties, a gap of 37 points.
Period 2026-08.Show the arithmetic
- 37 = |58 across US counties - 21 across Michigan counties|
position among the entities that published this metric this period; not an official level
noteCalhoun County, MI's average weekly wage was 8.8% higher than the same quarter a year earlier in 2026 Q1, on BLS QCEW's published over-the-year change.
Period 2026 Q1.Show the arithmetic
- +8.8 % = BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change for 2026 Q1, as published
- the newest QCEW file carries no year-earlier level, so no move from one level to another is printed
BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change, as published
noteCalhoun County, MI's covered employment was 4.0% higher than the same quarter a year earlier in 2026 Q1, on BLS QCEW's published over-the-year change.
Period 2026 Q1.Show the arithmetic
- +4 % = BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change for 2026 Q1, as published
- the newest QCEW file carries no year-earlier level, so no move from one level to another is printed
BLS QCEW over-the-year percent change, as published
noteCalhoun County, MI's years of wages of 2.5 ranks 82nd of 83 Michigan counties, against a median of 4.1.
Period 2026-08.Show the arithmetic
- 1 on the 0-to-100 scale across 83 Michigan counties that published yearsOfWages
- typical home value / (average weekly wage × 52); one average covered job, not a household
position among the entities that published this metric this period; not an official level
noteCalhoun County, MI's momentum index of 0.74 ranks 147th of 3,221 US counties, against a median of 0.23.
Period 2026-08.Show the arithmetic
- 95 on the 0-to-100 scale across 3221 US counties that published momentum
- momentum = Σ wᵢ · clip(changeᵢ / scaleᵢ, −1, 1) / Σ wᵢ over the terms present; weights and scales: home value 1-yr change 0.3 (±10%), rent 1-yr change 0.15 (±10%), jobs over-the-year change 0.3 (±3%), avg weekly wage over-the-year change 0.25 (±6%)
position among the entities that published this metric this period; not an official level
Read all 12 findings in the full brief
Every finding is produced by a fixed rule table and a fixed sentence for each rule. Nothing here is generated prose.